Illustrative sample

What a TenderWorth assessment actually looks like.

This example uses fictional supplier details and illustrative values. It demonstrates the decision structure only — it is not a real tender recommendation.

Decision: INVESTIGATE. Strong scope fit, but two mandatory items remain UNKNOWN and must be resolved before BID can be recommended.
Capability fit

82 / 100

Core mechanical-services scope and geography appear aligned. Comparable government project evidence is incomplete.

Commercial view

Potentially attractive

Indicative contract size appears within target range, but bid-hours and gross-margin assumptions require confirmation.

Confidence

Medium

Public opportunity information is current; supplier evidence remains incomplete.

Mandatory screen

Eligibility is checked before scoring.

PASS

Required service capability appears evidenced.

UNKNOWN

Specific insurance threshold has not yet been verified against the supplier policy.

UNKNOWN

Required comparable-project evidence has not yet been supplied.

Rule: unresolved mandatory UNKNOWNs prevent a BID recommendation.
Buyer / competition context

Evidence, not folklore

  • buyer history included only where a source supports it
  • incumbent signals labelled with confidence
  • no assumption that a past supplier will win again
  • missing evidence stays UNKNOWN
Recommended next actions

Resolve what could change the decision

  1. Confirm insurance threshold.
  2. Supply one comparable completed project.
  3. Estimate internal bid hours and approval cost.
  4. Recalculate expected bid economics.
  5. Upgrade to BID only if mandatory items pass and economics remain positive.
Founding cohort

Want this applied to your business?

The first complete assessment is free during founding validation, with no obligation to subscribe.